Compdigitec Labs

« | Home | »

Libavcodec – native NEON compile vs hybrid mode

By admin | October 4, 2012

Background

Benchmarks using the latest VLC beta and benching whether a native build solely for NEON is faster or a hybrid build. The expectation is that the native build should be very slightly faster than the hybrid build. This is done on a TI OMAP 4460 (Galaxy Nexus). Method is same as previous benchmarks.

Results

Ironically, it appears that the hybrid build is slightly faster(?) than the native NEON build, although in practice there is no real difference for the user. So the proper result should be inconclusive.

Hybrid mean 80.25% Native NEON mean 81.56%
Hybrid median 82.10% Native NEON median 82.80%

Libavcodec Native NEON mode vs hybrid mode

Raw data

Hybrid build:
19453   126 10079    R     575m 82.6   1 72.0 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     593m 85.3   1 64.4 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     594m 85.4   1 85.0 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     594m 85.5   0 83.1 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     594m 85.5   0 81.8 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     597m 85.9   0 77.9 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     597m 85.9   0 85.6 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     597m 85.9   0 85.5 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     598m 85.9   0 81.6 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     598m 86.0   0 82.1 org.videolan.vlc
19453   126 10079    S     598m 86.0   1 83.8 org.videolan.vlc

Native NEON build:
19703   126 10079    S     590m 84.8   0 68.4 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     589m 84.7   1 82.3 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     592m 85.1   1 81.1 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     592m 85.1   1 83.0 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     593m 85.2   1 81.0 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     593m 85.3   1 83.2 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     593m 85.3   1 82.8 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     594m 85.3   1 79.8 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     594m 85.4   1 83.8 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     594m 85.4   1 85.6 org.videolan.vlc
19703   126 10079    S     594m 85.4   1 86.2 org.videolan.vlc

If you found this article helpful or interesting, please help Compdigitec spread the word. Don’t forget to subscribe to Compdigitec Labs for more useful and interesting articles!

Topics: Mobile | 8 Comments »

8 Responses to “Libavcodec – native NEON compile vs hybrid mode”

  1. 4×4bet Says:
    November 8th, 2024 at 04:04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/10/04/libavcodec-native-neon-compile-vs-hybrid-mode/ […]

  2. lazywin888 Says:
    November 12th, 2024 at 10:56

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/10/04/libavcodec-native-neon-compile-vs-hybrid-mode/ […]

  3. lottorich28 Says:
    November 12th, 2024 at 14:00

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/10/04/libavcodec-native-neon-compile-vs-hybrid-mode/ […]

  4. fenix168 Says:
    November 12th, 2024 at 19:00

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/10/04/libavcodec-native-neon-compile-vs-hybrid-mode/ […]

  5. cat888 Says:
    November 12th, 2024 at 22:55

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/10/04/libavcodec-native-neon-compile-vs-hybrid-mode/ […]

  6. comprar Ambien Says:
    November 12th, 2024 at 23:11

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 87771 additional Info on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/10/04/libavcodec-native-neon-compile-vs-hybrid-mode/ […]

  7. escape from tarkov cheats Says:
    November 18th, 2024 at 06:57

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/10/04/libavcodec-native-neon-compile-vs-hybrid-mode/ […]

  8. อินเตอร์เน็ตบ้านทรู Says:
    November 22nd, 2024 at 12:44

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 41046 additional Info on that Topic: compdigitec.com/labs/2012/10/04/libavcodec-native-neon-compile-vs-hybrid-mode/ […]

Comments